Issue trackers and engineering wikis from 11 wound-down SaaS companies

Summary

Complete issue tracker and wiki exports from 11 venture-backed US SaaS companies that shut down or sold their assets between 2022 and 2025, which we collect through each company's wind-down process. Each company's history runs from early product to final release, including roadmaps, specs, bug triage, sprint planning and architecture decisions. Staff and customer identities, hostnames and credentials are replaced with consistent placeholders. The archive is closed and will not grow.

Collected to order. We collect it from US companies for your order. Scope, volume and timing are confirmed in writing before you sign.

Pricing on request

Request scope and pricing

At a glance

  • Planned scope. Volume, sources and timing are confirmed in writing before you sign.
Records
2.6Missues and wiki pages
Size
9 GB
Tokens, estimated
1.3B
Years
2012 to 2025
Firms
11
Owner profile
11 US venture-backed SaaS companies, 30 to 150 staff at peak, closed or sold between 2022 and 2025
Industry
Software
Data type
Code and engineering
Headcount
30 to 150 staff per firm at peak
Region
United States
Languages
English
Formats
JSONL
Updated

Sources

SystemKindRecords
JiraProjects and wiki2.36M issues, 9.8M comments
ConfluenceProjects and wiki214K pages

Good for

  • training planning agents on how real teams break epics into stories and tasks
  • evaluating spec-to-ticket breakdown against what teams actually filed
  • studying how engineering priorities shift as a company runs short of runway
  • retrieval over a whole company's design history from first spec to last release

Fields

FieldTypeDescription
firm_codestringPool member code
record_typeenumissue or page
keystringIssue key or page id
issue_typeenumepic, story, task, bug or spike, null for pages
created_attimestampCreation time
titlestringIssue summary or page title
bodystringDescription or page text
status_historyarray<string>Each status with the date it was entered
parent_keystringParent epic or page
commentsarray<object>Author and text for each comment, in order

Example record

{
  "firm_code": "F03",
  "record_type": "issue",
  "key": "CORE-7731",
  "issue_type": "bug",
  "created_at": "2021-11-03T09:14:22Z",
  "title": "Duplicate invoices when webhook retries after timeout",
  "body": "When the payment processor retries a webhook after our 10s timeout we create a second invoice. Seen for [ACCOUNT_88] and [ACCOUNT_131] this week. Need idempotency on the event id.",
  "status_history": [
    "Open 2021-11-03",
    "In Progress 2021-11-04",
    "Done 2021-11-09"
  ],
  "parent_key": "CORE-7605",
  "comments": [
    {
      "author": "[PERSON_5]",
      "text": "Added a unique index on provider_event_id and return 200 on conflict. Backfilled the dedupe for the 14 affected accounts."
    },
    {
      "author": "[PERSON_12]",
      "text": "Verified in staging with forced timeouts. Old duplicates are voided, not deleted, so finance keeps the trail."
    }
  ]
}
One record, de-identified. Placeholders such as [PERSON_12] and [COMPANY_4] stay the same across the whole dataset, so threads still read correctly.

Licenses available

  • Exclusive

    One buyer. Nobody else can license it during the exclusive term, usually 2 years.

  • Non-exclusive

    Licensed to more than one buyer.

  • First look

    One buyer gets 2 to 4 weeks to make an offer before anyone else sees the dataset.

What ships with it

  • Datasheet: what it is, what it is good for, verified size, sources, years, format and limits.
  • Provenance file: the owner shown by code, staff notice and consent status, exclusions, mapped to the EU AI Act Article 53 training-data summary and California AB 2013.
  • Manifest with a hash for every file.
  • QC report and de-identification report.
  • Your own copy, with unique canary records.

How it is de-identified

Default exclusions removed, files flattened to text, identifiers found in three layers and replaced with consistent placeholders, and the result measured against a 99% bar for each identifier type in each source.

The full method

Request scope and pricing

We confirm scope, volume and timing in writing before you sign. Samples go out under evaluation terms after a short buyer check, once the first records are in.

Dataset: NK-14259

Organization type
What would you like?
Intended use
License interest

We use these details to reply to you and handle your request. See our Privacy Notice.