Brazil federal tax appeal decisions, complete set in Portuguese
Summary
Every published decision of Brazil's federal administrative tax appeals council and its predecessor taxpayer councils, from the ordinary panels up to the superior chamber, with headnote, operative ruling and full reasoning. The set is complete against the council's public index, 587,344 decisions, and grows as new sessions publish. Useful for long-document legal reasoning in Portuguese, outcome prediction and headnote generation in tax law, including credit, penalty and customs valuation disputes.
Inventory confirmed. The full public set is held and the data is in processing.
Pricing on request
Request a sample or pricingAt a glance
- Still growing. Refresh deliveries available.
- Records
- 587Kdecisions
- Size
- 15.1 GB
- Tokens, estimated
- 4B
- Years
- 1992 to 2026
- Source
- Public decisions of Brazil's federal administrative tax appeals council and its predecessor councils, from the council's official decision index and published PDFs
- Industry
- Legal
- Data type
- Public records
- Region
- Brazil
- Languages
- Portuguese
- Formats
- JSONL
- Updated
Sources
| System | Kind | Records |
|---|---|---|
| CARF public decision index | Public records | 587K decision records |
| CARF published decision PDFs | Public records | 587K full texts |
Good for
- training long-document legal reasoning in Portuguese
- predicting appeal outcomes from the case report alone
- generating headnotes from full decisions and scoring them against the published headnote
- evaluating retrieval and citation over a complete tax-law corpus
Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| decision_id | string | Stable id of the decision in this dataset |
| process_number | string | Administrative case number as published, masked when the taxpayer is an individual |
| session_date | date | Date of the judging session |
| publication_date | date | Date the decision was published |
| body | object | Section, chamber and panel that judged the appeal |
| subject | string | Tax and topic of the dispute as indexed |
| outcome | enum | granted, partly_granted, denied or not_heard, derived from the operative ruling |
| headnote | string | The published headnote (ementa) |
| holding | string | The operative ruling with the vote result |
| full_text | string | Full decision text: report, vote and ruling |
| rapporteur | string | Reporting councilor, replaced with a stable code |
| source_url | string | Link to the published PDF, masked when the taxpayer is an individual |
Sample record
{
"decision_id": "CARF-D-0204118",
"process_number": "[PROCESS_118]",
"session_date": "2024-08-21",
"publication_date": "2024-10-03",
"body": {
"section": "3ª Seção de Julgamento",
"chamber": "4ª Câmara",
"panel": "2ª Turma Ordinária"
},
"subject": "PIS/Pasep não cumulativo, créditos sobre insumos",
"outcome": "partly_granted",
"headnote": "ASSUNTO: CONTRIBUIÇÃO PARA O PIS/PASEP. Período de apuração: 01/10/2019 a 31/12/2019. NÃO CUMULATIVIDADE. INSUMOS. ESSENCIALIDADE E RELEVÂNCIA. FRETES NA AQUISIÇÃO DE INSUMOS. CRÉDITO. POSSIBILIDADE. Os gastos com frete na aquisição de insumos, suportados pelo adquirente e tributados pela contribuição, geram direito a crédito. EQUIPAMENTOS DE PROTEÇÃO INDIVIDUAL. Os EPIs de uso obrigatório na atividade produtiva são insumos para fins de crédito.",
"holding": "Acordam os membros do colegiado, por maioria de votos, em dar parcial provimento ao Recurso Voluntário para reverter as glosas sobre fretes na aquisição de insumos e sobre equipamentos de proteção individual. Vencido o conselheiro [PERSON_15] quanto aos fretes.",
"full_text": "RELATÓRIO. Trata-se de Recurso Voluntário interposto por [COMPANY_4] contra acórdão da Delegacia de Julgamento que manteve em parte as glosas de créditos apuradas no despacho decisório sobre o pedido de ressarcimento do 4º trimestre de 2019. (...)",
"rapporteur": "[PERSON_12]",
"source_url": "[URL_3]"
}Licenses available
Non-exclusive
Licensed to more than one buyer.
What ships with it
- Datasheet: what it is, what it is good for, verified size, sources, years, format and limits.
- Provenance file: the public sources, how they were collected and joined, and what was removed, mapped to the EU AI Act Article 53 training-data summary and California AB 2013.
- Manifest with a hash for every file.
- QC report, with what was removed or masked.
- Your own copy, with unique canary records.
How it is prepared
Business names stay as published, because they are public record. Personal contact details and the names of individuals in free text are removed before delivery.
Names and CPF numbers of individual taxpayers are masked before delivery. For those decisions the case number and the source link are masked too, because either one leads back to the published PDF.